English Teaching: Practice and Critique
Teachers working around large-scale assessment: Reconstructing professionalism and professional development
Volume 3 Number 2 September 2004
Trevor Gambell (Professor Emeritus, University of Saskatchewan, Canada)
Educational reform initiatives are predicated on
the professionalisation of teaching. Professionalisation implies
that teachers assume and practice increased control in areas of
non-instructional decision-making, rather than being preoccupied with
content and procedural knowledge. As professionals, teachers are called
upon to grapple with larger educational purposes and directions.
In a more professional culture, teachers assume greater responsibility
for generating their own expert knowledge. Large-scale assessment is
often been portrayed as inimical to the interests of teachers and as an
anathema by professional teacher associations. Little primary research
has touched upon the impact of large-scale testing on teachers’
self-identity, their sense of professionalism, and their use of
evaluative research. This study examines why English teachers
were motivated to take part professionally in a 1998 Canadian
large-scale literacy assessment. Teachers were interviewed
before, during, and four to six months after taking part in the scoring
sessions. This paper examines an evolving and enhanced concept of
professionalism among these teachers. Rather than robbing these
teachers of their professional autonomy and judgment, participation in
this assessment program challenged them to reflect upon their own
content and practical knowledge, critique their own teaching and
evaluation practices, and redefine their professional roles. Emergent
themes include affirmation and reaffirmation, validation of knowledge
and classroom practice, clarification of large-scale assessment’s role
in teacher and learning, enhanced professionalism, and philosophical
shifts. These teachers reconstructed professionalism and
undertook professional development on an individual and collective
basis and through a variety of experiences considered inimical to the
collective professional welfare of teachers just a few years ago.