English Teaching: Practice and Critique
English teachers as researchers
Volume 4 Number 2 September 2005
Mary Hill (Faculty of Education, University of Auckland)
Sue Brindley (University of Cambridge, UK)
Teachers as researchers, as a term, carries with
it a particular dynamic. It seems to lack an authenticity. Try it out
elsewhere: librarian as poet, unemployed single mother as writer,
seamstress as political activist. That these refer respectively
to Philip Larkin, Rosa Parks and J.K Rowling may give a flavour of the
feeling we have that the term is simply patronising. In our
respective roles as pre-service teacher educators, we do not recognise
ourselves in the term researcher as teacher. We are both — not one
acting as the other. So we should like to offer the term teacher and
researcher to describe the group of people who have contributed to this
special edition of English Teaching: Practice and Critique. Some of us
work in a school context, which in itself is not an homogeneous
concept, representing as our contributors do academically successful
schools, struggling schools, comprehensive schools, single-sex schools,
independent schools, community schools — labels do not do justice to
variety but may indicate the diversity of perceptions the group holds.
Some of us work in a University context; some in advisory roles with a
variety of schools. We are all involved in the same quest: developing
an understanding of the ways in which education works and how different
practices impacts on the English/literacy classroom. And this volume,
it is hoped, will enable us to contribute to that body of
knowledge.