English Teaching: Practice and Critique

Volume 5, Number 3 (December 2006): Focus: English (literature) and gender


Editor: Amanda Haertling Thein (College of Education, University of Iowa)

Rationale: Volume 5, Number 3 of English Teaching: Practice and Critique is focused on gendered aspects of English and the teaching of literature. In recent years, research into the teaching of literature has moved toward a focus on the ways in which readers' experiences with texts are mediated by social and cultural perspectives and participation in competing activity systems, discourse communities and social worlds. Socio-cultural views of the teaching of literature call for particular attention to be paid to the ways in which students' gender identities impact their engagement with literature and their overall performance in the English classroom and beyond.

While we understand gender to be socially and culturally constructed and performed as opposed to biologically predetermined, we also understand that people construct their identities by taking up storylines and narratives that they encounter in daily life. These storylines continue to be largely based on an interdependent, gendered binary of masculinity and femininity that is stubbornly resistant to change. This binary creates gaps in performance and limitations in learning for both boys and girls. Research has shown consistently that in general boys when compared to girls of similar ethnicity and class perform less well in all aspects of examined English. They also read less than girls at all stages and their interest in reading drops off much earlier in the secondary school. Conversely, research suggests that girls read primarily narrative fiction, while boys often read across genres '“ a practice that better prepares boys for the kinds of critical thinking required in higher education.  

Two articles in this issue examine gender boundaries in U.S. classrooms in the context of the teaching of literary texts. Others challenge traditional boundaries between texts and readers in the context of literature teaching in a range of contexts (Canada, England and Hong Kong).

View contents of issue